Tagged: lubrication

Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

Critical Condition Monitoring Tests for Compressor Oils

To ensure these oils remain healthy (and not contaminated or degraded), a few basic tests can be performed on all compressors, regardless of type (reciprocating, screw, refrigerant, etc.). These include:

  • Viscosity – this is key as some of the gases can easily affect the viscosity, which (if decreased) will not provide adequate separation for the interacting surfaces and cause wear. Generally, a ±10% limit is used (though OEMs may use different values).
  • Acid Number – if this begins increasing, then we have an accumulation of acids in the oil, which can be because of contamination. For most compressors, a 0.2 mg KOH/g increase is the warning limit, but for refrigeration compressors, the limit is tighter at +0.1 mg KOH/g. Always check with your OEM for these limits.
  • Water content – changes by OEM and refrigerant type, as the different gases will have varied tolerances.
  • Wear metals – these values will vary as per OEM, as well, since they are all designed with different types of metals. Users should look for trends or significant increases in these values to indicate wear.

Some specialty tests for compressors include:

  • MPC (Membrane Patch Colorimetry) – this helps to measure if there is any potential for the oil to form varnish. Given the high temperatures these types of equipment endure and the potential for contamination, the oil is at risk of forming varnish. While limits will vary by OEM, some general guidelines to follow are 0-20 Normal, 20-30 Warning, >30 Action required
  • RULER® (Remaining Useful Life Evaluation Routine) – this quantifies the remaining level of antioxidants in the oil. When oxidation occurs, the antioxidants get depleted. As such, by monitoring antioxidant levels, one can easily determine whether oxidation is happening in the oil. The general rule of thumb is that if the level falls below 25%, there are not enough antioxidants to keep the oil healthy and prevent degradation.
  • Air Release (DIN ISO 9120) – measures the ability of the oil to allow air to escape and not keep the air in the oil. If air bubbles remain in the oil, this can be devastating, as it can lead to micropitting, cavitation, or increased oxidation. Users can trend the values; if they increase, it indicates that the air is taking longer to be released, which means it is staying in the oil and in the system longer.
  • Particle Count – this can identify if there are any contaminants in the system. These oils must be kept clean, and OEMs typically specify target cleanliness levels.

Compressors are critical equipment, and we must understand how they work and the lubricant specifications required. Monitoring their health can also help us avoid unnecessary downtime and keep our facilities running.

References

  1. Mang, T., & Dresel, W. (2007). Lubricants and Lubrication. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
  2. Totten, G. E. (2006). Handbook of Lubrication and Tribology – Volume 1 Application and Maintenance – Second Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  3. Shell Lubricants. (2025, November 08). The Shell Corena range. Retrieved from Shell Lubricants Compressor Oils: https://www.shell.com/business-customers/lubricants-for-business/products/shell-corena-compressor-oils/_jcr_content/root/main/containersection-0/simple_1354779491/promo_1484925192/links/item0.stream/1759302155345/17be2a9a74057f321bb209128933f68f8b88ca70/s
  4. ExxonMobil. (2025, November 08). Refrigeration Lubricant Selection for Industrial Systems. Retrieved from ExxonMobil Lubricants: https://www.mobil.com/lubricants/-/media/project/wep/mobil/mobil-row-us-1/new-pdf/refrigeration-lubricant-selection-for-industrial-systems.pdf
  5. Chevron Lubricants. (2025, November 08). Optimizing compressor performance and equipment life through best lubrication practices Chevron. Retrieved from Chevron Lubricants: https://www.chevronlubricants.com/content/dam/external/industrial/en_us/sales-material/all-other/Whitepaper_CompressorOils.pdf

Find out more in the full article, "Compressor Oil, Types, Applications and Performance Drivers" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
January 7, 2026
Oil Properties

Refrigeration Lubricants

For industrial refrigeration systems, there are a couple of essential pieces of information to consider before selecting the most suitable oil. The user must know the refrigerant in use, the evaporator type (dry or wet; carryover < 15%), the evaporator temperature, the compressor type, and the outlet temperature.

The refrigerant fluids are classified as per the ASHRAE classification (ANSI-ASHRAE Standard 34-2001):

  • R717 — Ammonia
  • R12 — Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)
  • R22 — Hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)
  • R600a — Isobutane
  • R744 — Carbon dioxide (CO2)
  • R134a, R404a, R507 — Hydrofluorocarbons (HFC)

It should be noted that CFCs were banned under the Montreal Protocol (1989) due to their Ozone Depletion Potential, and HCFCs are being phased out due to their Global Warming Potential.

Chevron provides some general guidelines for selecting the appropriate refrigerant, as shown in the table below.5

(But you should always follow the guidelines of your OEM when selecting the appropriate lubricant.)

Table 1: Refrigerants and their associated lubricant technologies

ExxonMobil classifies its refrigeration lubricants based on refrigerant type, evaporator temperature, and compressor type (Piston, Screw, or Centrifugal). This is very helpful when determining the best-suited lubricant for your refrigerant compressor.

Check out the pdf here.

 

Find out more in the full article, "Compressor Oil, Types, Applications and Performance Drivers" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
January 7, 2026
Oil Properties

Industry Standards for Compressor Oils

Some other classifications which users may see when dealing with compressor oils (even though some of these standards may be dated) include:

ISO 6743-3, which uses the following acronyms for associated compressors:

  • DAA, DAB, DAG to DAJ: Air compressors
  • DVA to DVF: Vacuum pumps
  • DGA to DGE: Gas compressors
  • DRA to DRG: Refrigeration compressors

 

In this standard, the “D” family includes detailed classifications of lubricants used in air, gas, and refrigeration compressors. The second letter usually indicates the type of compressor, and the third letter indicates the application severity or type, especially for gas or refrigeration compressors.

For instance;

DAJ represents:

D -> Compressor Lubricant

A -> Air compressor

J-> Lubricant drain cycles of >4000 hours

DVB represents:

D-> Compressor Lubricant

V->Vacuum pumps, Positive Displacement Vacuum pumps with oil lubricated compression chambers, Reciprocating and rotary drip feed, Rotary oil-flooded (vane and screw)

B-> Low vacuum for aggressive gas (102 to10-1kPa or 103 to 1 mbar)

DGD represents:

D-> Compressor Lubricant

G-> Positive displacement reciprocating and rotary compressors for all gases, Compressors for refrigeration circuits or heat pump circuits, together with air compressors, are excluded.

D-> Gases that react chemically with mineral oil, usually synthetic fluids, HCI, CI2, O2, and oxygen-enriched air at all pressures. CO2 at pressures above 103 kPa (10 bar) with O2- and oxygen-enriched air: mineral oils are prohibited, and very few synthetic fluids are compatible.

DRB represents:

D-> Compressor Lubricant

R-> Compressors, refrigeration systems

B-> Ammonia (NH3), Miscible, Polyalkylene glycol, Commercial and industrial refrigeration, For direct expansion evaporators; PAGs for open compressors and factory-built units.

Another standard which is also used in this industry is DIN 51506, which defines:

  • VB, VC: Uninhibited mineral oils (no oxidation inhibitors)
  • VBL: Mineral oil-based engine oil (additives that protect from corrosion and oxidation and air compressor temperatures up to 140°C)
  • VCL: Mineral oil-based engine oil (additives that protect from corrosion and oxidation and air compressor temperatures up to 160°C)
  • VDL: Inhibited oils with increased aging resistance (additives that protect from corrosion and oxidation and air compressor temperatures up to 220°C, recommended for compressors with 2-stage compression)

One more standard is DIN 52503, which has these classifications:

  • KAA: Not miscible with ammonia
  • KAB: Miscible with ammonia
  • KB: For carbon dioxide (CO2)
  • KC: For partly and fully halogenated fluorinated and chlorinated hydrocarbons (CFC, HCFC)
  • KD: For partly and fully fluorinated hydrocarbons (HFC, FC)
  • KE: For hydrocarbons (e.g., propane, isobutane)

These standards are referenced when discussing certain compressor oils, and their definitions are helpful for navigating acronyms.

Find out more in the full article, "Compressor Oil, Types, Applications and Performance Drivers" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
January 7, 2026
Oil Properties

Types of Compressors and Oils

Compressors are integral to many of our operations. They are used to compress gas, increasing its pressure, and to power tools. They can also be used as vacuum pumps or blowers, but each application is different. As such, they require various types of lubrication, particularly for applications that use specific refrigerants and come into contact with the lubricant.

In all these applications, the functions of the oil remain largely the same: it must lubricate the surfaces, prevent wear and corrosion, maintain the required viscosity, and provide proper sealing.

In this article, we will dive into the various types of compressor oils and explain why they are suited to these applications. We will also discuss monitoring the health of these oils and the tests that should be performed to ensure your compressor oils remain healthy.

Types of Compressors

Essentially, there are two main types of compressors: Displacement and Dynamic. For displacement compressors, gas is drawn into a chamber, compressed, and expelled by a reciprocating piston. On the other hand, for dynamic compressors, turbine wheels accelerate a medium, which is then abruptly accelerated.1

Positive displacement compressors include Reciprocating and Rotating compressors. These can be further subdivided as shown in Figure 1. For Dynamic (Turbo) compressors, these are further subdivided into Centrifugal, Axial, and Mixed types (also shown in Figure 1).

Figure 1: Types of compressors
Figure 1: Types of compressors

Depending on the type of compressor, the required lubricant will vary. For example, positive-displacement compressors use rolling or sliding motion and include bearing and sealing components within the compression chamber. On the other hand, dynamic compressors use hydrodynamic journal and thrust bearings, or rolling-element bearings, to support the main shaft, which is isolated from the compression chamber.

Working pressures, temperatures, and the type of gas being compressed also play a significant role in determining the appropriate lubricant.2

As with most applications, there can be a dry-sump or a wet-sump. Wet sumps are typically seen in reciprocating and rotary screw compressors.  In a wet sump, the gas usually contacts the oil, lowering its viscosity. This is where it is essential to note the gas’s solubility in the system oil. Natural gas and other hydrocarbons are more soluble in mineral oils and PAOs than in PAGs and diesters. Thus, PAGs may be preferred in some cases to avoid lubricant failure.

Compressor Oils

Most of the major global lubricant OEMs have classified their oils based on:

  • Rotary vane and screw air compressor oils
  • Reciprocating (piston) air compressor oils
  • Refrigeration compressor oils

As seen below in Figure 2, Shell Lubricants3 has a line of lubricants, particularly for air compressors, which are further classified into mineral oils, PAOs, and PAGs for Rotary vane and screw air compressors or Reciprocating (piston) air compressors.

Figure 2: Shell Lubricants for Air Compressors
Figure 2: Shell Lubricants for Air Compressors

In reciprocating air compressors, cylinder design dictates the lubrication type, as this is the most severe application. Compressing the gas usually results in high temperatures, which can easily lead to oxidation. The compressed gas must be free of contaminants, as contaminants can accelerate oxidation. Typically, for reciprocating air compressors, mineral oils or PAO- or di-ester-based lubricants in the ISO VG 68 to 150 range are preferred.

Rotary vane compressors can experience pressure extremes as the vanes slide to compress the gas, and oil is continuously injected into the compressor chambers. Typically, ISO VG 68-150 oils are used in this application.

Figure 3: Reciprocating Piston vs Screw Compressor Lubricant Needs
Figure 3: Reciprocating Piston vs Screw Compressor Lubricant Needs

For screw compressors, the oil must perform several functions, including lubricating the meshing rotors and the plain and roller bearings that form part of the geared coupling. ISO VG 46 mineral oils are usually used in these compressors, but the viscosity can be increased to ISO VG 68 or to synthetic PAO or PAG lubricants at higher ambient temperatures. Similarly, Group III base oils of these viscosities can be used in this area. Most screw compressor oils contain mild EP/AW performance additives and require an FZG failure load≥10.

Ideally, reciprocating piston compressors will use higher viscosities (ISO VG 100-150) with extremely low carbon residue and no or mild EP/AW additives. Conversely, screw compressors will use lower viscosities (ISO VG 46 or 68) with excellent oxidation stability and mild/high AW/EP additives1, as shown in Figure 3.

Find out more in the full article, "Compressor Oil, Types, Applications and Performance Drivers" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
January 7, 2026
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

How to identify the Root Causes of ESD in Lubrication

Thus far, all the prevention methods have focused on the physical roots of ESD. We did not explore some of the human or systemic roots that are also accountable for ESD. In this section, we will develop a logic tree designed to address a critical failure occurring in a plant. This will be used as an example of the logic tree, which can be developed when investigating the root causes of ESD.

Let’s start with the top of the logic tree, where we define the event or the reason we care. In this situation, it is an unplanned shutdown for 4 hours. An unplanned shutdown will impact the plant’s production, which is why we care about conducting this investigation.

We will assume that the failure mode occurred on one of the critical pumps, and we are investigating how that failure could have happened. Note, we did not ask the question “Why?” because it can be misleading to an opinion, and we are trying to stay as factual as possible.

A disciplined root cause analysis doesn’t start with ‘why’ – it starts with evidence. Each degradation mechanism tells its own story, and Electrostatic Spark Discharge is just one of them.

For this investigation, we will investigate the hypothesis of a critical bearing failing due to lubricant degradation. Since we are focused on ESD for this article, we will have only one hypothesis regarding the degradation mode being ESD. However, in the real world, if this logic tree were being developed, we would be investigating the six various lubricant degradation mechanisms: oxidation, thermal degradation, microdieseling, ESD, additive depletion, and contamination.

Figure 1: Top part of the Logic tree for ESD
Figure 1: Top part of the Logic tree for ESD

As shown in Figure 1, at the top of the logic tree, we start by placing our hypotheses on the tree, and then using evidence/facts, we can rule them out afterwards. This is a critical step as the investigation should be able to stand on its own in the court of law (even if it may not reach that point). The next hypothesis is the buildup of static in the oil. There are three possible ways for this to occur;

  • Clearances too tight (as discussed earlier, this can lead to molecular friction, which can induce static)
  • Less than adequate grounding system (if a proper grounding system doesn’t exist, then there isn’t an option for the static to dissipate)
  • Less than adequate conductivity of the oil (if the conductivity of the oil is too low, then the charge can build up and cause it to be dissipated along the system, such as the filters)

Now, we need to investigate each of the three main hypotheses stated and find out the root causes for them.

Let’s begin with the Clearances being too tight hypothesis.

For this hypothesis, we will ask the question, “How can clearances be too tight?”. In this case (and we will have to keep it general and in broad buckets, so we can drill down into these later and eliminate as necessary), there are three possible reasons:

  • The OEM could have designed the system such that it was less than adequate (LTA)
  • The flow rate could have been increased above the recommended threshold
  • Incorrect viscosity of the lubricant could cause additional friction (we will dive into this one later).

We will develop the other two hypotheses in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Investigating the hypothesis, "Clearances too tight"
Figure 2: Investigating the hypothesis, "Clearances too tight"

If we further investigate where the OEM did not design the system effectively, we can determine that the operating conditions were probably not adequately considered before implementation. This is a systemic root cause and one that needs to be addressed with the OEM.

On the other hand, if we investigated the flow rate, there could be two main reasons for the adjustment. One could be because of system changes, which forced adjustments to the flow rate. Since a decision was made here, it is a human root cause. Someone decided to change the flow rate based on the variables involved. However, if we investigate why these changes were made (once a human is involved, the question moves from how to why), we can determine that the system was not designed to accommodate these changes. This is a systemic root.

Similarly, if the operational conditions change (such as when a higher output is required, which is different from system changes), then the flow rate must be adjusted. Again, a decision must be made here, and a human is involved. Then we ask the question, “Why?”. In this case, we have the same systemic root, and the design is inadequate to accommodate the necessary changes.

For this part of the tree, we have found some human root causes where decisions were made, as well as systemic root causes. Both need to be addressed when we perform the final root cause analysis. For the human root causes, we can think about the procedures that guided them to make those decisions (if they existed) and amend these accordingly.

On to the next hypothesis, which we have yet to investigate (still under the clearances being too tight), the incorrect viscosity of the lubricant, which is shown in Figure 3. There are a couple of ways in which this can happen:

  • OEM recommendations were not followed
  • There was an unavailability of the specified viscosity of the lubricant
  • There was a less-than-adequate procedure for selecting the correct viscosity of lubricant

If we investigate why the OEM recommendations were not followed, we can find two main reasons. Either they were not documented and therefore could not be followed, or the internal best practice was used instead to replace the OEM recommendations. In both cases, these would be systemic root causes, and we should investigate why these were not documented or why they were replaced.

Figure 3: Investigating the hypothesis, “Incorrect viscosity of lubricant”
Figure 3: Investigating the hypothesis, “Incorrect viscosity of lubricant”

When investigating the unavailability of the specified viscosity of the lubricant, we can find two main causes. Either there was an issue with the restocking of this lubricant at the warehouse due to their forecasting, or appropriate checks were not carried out. This is a systemic root cause that should be investigated further.

Another hypothesis could be that the specified lubricant was unavailable from the supplier. This is another systemic root cause and should be addressed with the supplier to ensure it is resolved in the future.

When lubricant viscosity errors trace back to missing stock or missing training, the problem isn’t the person or the product – it’s the system that allowed both to fail.

On the other hand, if we examine the procedure for selecting the correct viscosity of the lubricant, we identify a human root cause, as someone would have made the decision on which viscosity to use. But in this case, we need to investigate why the person was not trained to determine this value.

There are two main reasons why a person does not receive training: either it doesn’t exist, or it was not followed. In both cases, these are systemic roots that need to be further investigated and addressed.

Now, we will investigate the next major hypothesis, “LTA grounding of the system” in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Investigating the hypothesis, “LTA Grounding of the system”
Figure 4: Investigating the hypothesis, “LTA Grounding of the system”

When investigating the grounding of a system, we can identify two major classes: either it doesn’t exist, or it didn’t meet the requirements. If grounding did not exist, then this is an inadequate system design and therefore a systemic root cause. On the other hand, if the grounding did not meet the OEM requirements, we need to determine how this was possible.

Figure 5: Investigation of the hypothesis, “LTA Conductivity of oil”
Figure 5: Investigation of the hypothesis, “LTA Conductivity of oil”

There are two possibilities: the site’s best practices were used to replace the OEM standards, which is something we often see, especially if these requirements have worked in the past. This is a systemic root cause that should be investigated. Or there were fewer than adequate components to achieve grounding.

In this case, we can have components that are not designed for the system (do not meet the system’s requirements) or components that were not OEM-recommended and are being used (such as aftermarket products that do not meet the necessary specifications).

Finally, on to the last major hypothesis, “LTA conductivity of the oil,” as shown in Figure 5.

As noted earlier, if an oil has a conductivity of more than 100pS/m, it will be able to dissipate any accumulated charge easily. However, if it falls below this value, the charge will be dissipated in the system at the earliest opportunity.

How can oil have less than adequate conductivity? Perhaps the elements of the oil have a less-than-adequate conductivity. If that is the case, then there can be two plausible reasons for this. Either the formulation was not appropriately designed, or the materials (base oils, additives) were not of a particular standard. Both causes are systemic root causes and should be investigated further to determine if anything can be done to correct these.

If we were to summarize a list of the root causes, we would see that many are systemic, while a few are human, as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Summary of the root causes of ESD
Figure 6: Summary of the root causes of ESD

This further reiterates the need to develop a comprehensive logic tree when investigating any failure, as many root causes are not physical or surface-level. If these are not adequately addressed, the failure mode will recur in the future. The entire logic tree can be found here under additional support material, along with logic trees for other degradation mechanisms.

References

Mathura, S. (2020). Lubrication Degradation Mechanisms: A Complete Guide. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Mathura, S., & Latino, R. (2021). Lubrication Degradation: Getting into the Root Causes. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Find out more in the full article, "Root Causes of Electrostatic Spark Discharge in Modern Lubrication Systems" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
November 15, 2025
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

What are Effective Strategies to Prevent ESD in Lubrication?

ESD occurs when there is a buildup of static in the oil; therefore, one of the best methods of preventing it is to ensure that the static levels remain low or are dissipated before they have a chance to wreak havoc on the system. The simplest and most common way of reducing this static is the installation of antistatic filters. These filters can help to remove static from the system before it builds up to dangerous levels, where it can burn the membranes or develop varnish.

Static in oil is inevitable – how you control and discharge it determines whether your system runs clean or burns itself from within.

Ensuring that the system is grounded correctly is another way to guarantee that any built-up static is removed. This is where your electricians can perform checks and install proper grounding devices for your equipment to safeguard against this buildup of static in the system. Therefore, if static charges get built up in the system, they can be dissipated without the effects of ESD.

If oils experience high levels of conductivity, they can conduct static. Typically, if the conductivity is above 100pS/m, there is potential for the fluid to conduct the charge and allow it to be discharged along the system without causing harm.

Unfortunately, there are base oils with low conductivity (below 100pS/m) that cannot carry the charge and dissipate more easily. As such, these types of oils will see an increase in the presence of ESD if not formulated correctly for modern lubrication systems.

As the viscosity of the oil decreases, more force is required to pass through the filters, which can lead to a buildup of static at a molecular level. Additionally, as temperatures decrease, the viscosity also decreases. In these cases, keeping the oil at the system temperature (designed for that particular viscosity) can help to reduce the buildup of static charge in the oil.

Find out more in the full article, "Root Causes of Electrostatic Spark Discharge in Modern Lubrication Systems" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
November 15, 2025
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

Understanding Electrostatic Spark Discharge and Its Impact on Lubrication Systems

Electrostatic Spark Discharge typically occurs when static is built up in an oil at a molecular level, causing it to discharge in the system and create free radicals, which increase the opportunity for varnish to form. This usually occurs at temperatures of around 10,000 °C.

If we were to liken this to an everyday situation, we could think about walking around a carpeted room where the static builds up in our body. When we touch a metallic object (more than likely a door handle), we get a bit of a shock as the built-up static is discharged through us and the door handle.

Inside a lubricant system, static doesn’t just build – it ignites microscopic sparks powerful enough to scar filters and start the chain reaction that leads to varnish.

Similarly, in lubricants, static exists at a molecular level, and in areas of tighter clearances, some molecules are forced to rub against each other, causing a buildup of static. When it accumulates to the point of becoming a full charge, it dissipates at the first opportunity, usually at the filter membrane or some sharp-edged object along the way. These are seen as burnt patches on the filter membrane.

When this spark occurs, it creates a chemical reaction that generates free radicals. Free radicals are highly reactive species that need to engage with other substances. These are the initiators of varnish, and their presence can accelerate reactions, leading to deposits forming in the lubricant. Eventually, this will lead to a system that has experienced both ESD and oxidation.

In this article, we will discuss various identification methods and ways to prevent ESD in modern lubrication systems. We will also spend some time identifying typical root causes for ESD by developing a logic tree as a guide for future investigations.

 

How to Identify Electrostatic Spark Discharge in Lubrication Systems

Every degradation mechanism produces varying results in the form of deposits or in how these are formed. For ESD, some tell-tale signs alert the user to its occurrence. These include:

  • Crackling sounds / buzzing outside of components – This noise is representative of sparks as they discharge on part of the media/asset. Typically, this occurs when the fluid is in motion, allowing it to be heard near the filters when the system is operating.
  • Burnt or pinhole filter membrane – The filters usually feel the full effect of ESD, and small burn patches or even pinholes are created when ESD occurs. When changing filters, the membranes should be examined for these patches to determine if ESD is occurring.

Free radicals are produced when ESD occurs. As such, this leads to polymerization of the lubricant, which produces varnish and sludge. This is part of the oxidation process, and the antioxidant levels will begin to decrease. During ESD, certain gases are also released in the oil. Some of the lab tests which can be used for identifying where ESD has occurred include:

  • RULER® – Remaining Useful Life Evaluation Routine test, which quantifies the presence of antioxidants in the oil. By trending this over time, one will be able to determine whether the levels of antioxidants are decreasing or not. Typically, this test can be performed twice annually on larger sumps (such as turbines) or the frequency can be increased according to the criticality of the equipment. If the value gets below 25% then this is the critical limit, and methods to regenerate the oil or change it should be explored.
  • MPC – Membrane Patch Colorimetry – this measures the potential of the oil to form varnish or deposits. Depending on the equipment, the warning limits will vary, but a good rule of thumb is to treat results below 10 as normal, those above 15 as within the monitor range, and those above 20-25 as the critical range. Be sure to double-check these levels with the OEM of the equipment.
  • FTIR – Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy can identify various molecules in the oil. It is likened to identifying the fingerprint of the oil, where each molecule has a specific characteristic spectra representative of that molecule. This test can be used to identify the presence of oxidation or any deposits that may have formed.
  • DGA – Dissolved Gas Analysis – this test can be used to identify the presence of particular gases that are released during ESD, such as acetylene, ethylene, and methane.

Those above are just some of the methods that can be used to identify the presence of ESD in a lubrication system.

Find out more in the full article, "Root Causes of Electrostatic Spark Discharge in Modern Lubrication Systems" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
November 15, 2025
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

Sensors vs Traditional Oil Analysis

In this age of AI, it seems that everyone is moving towards sensors and online data. Oil analysis sensors aren’t far behind in this revolution. There are mid-infrared sensors that have been engineered to relate their findings to those of regular oil tests (developed by Spectrolytic). While sensors are the way of the future, the fundamental concept remains the same. What are we doing with the data, and what data are we trending?

Sensors deliver speed, but proven lab methods still set the benchmark for accuracy.

Traditional oil analysis labs trend data, albeit the frequency of the data points is not as high as that of an online sensor. Hence, subtle/instant changes may not be readily noticed or detected. The methods used in these labs have been tried and tested over the years (and approved by various standards committees) to reflect conditions that the oil is facing in the field.

On the other hand, in the sensor world, not many of them (with the few exceptions) correlate exactly to what is being seen in the field. Hence, some lab tests, especially for the specialty tests such as RULER, MPC, and TOST (mainly for turbines), still need to be done by the lab. This is a great opportunity for traditional labs and sensor companies to collaborate and provide customers with collated data.

Moving Towards Sustainable Maintenance

While this article explicitly discusses extending the oil drain intervals for your assets, it underscores the importance of working alongside maintenance and condition monitoring to achieve these results. There is no clear cookie-cutter routine to achieve this, as each fleet of assets will be different and require varying levels of complexity for analysis. One thing is clear, though: we need to move towards sustainable maintenance.

Performing maintenance in the traditional way of just waiting for the appointed interval may be costing us increased labor and parts. However, by working alongside maintenance and condition monitoring, we can get more value from our assets and even increase our ROIs. Sustainable maintenance is the way forward for most asset owners as we move into a new era of maintenance.

Find out more in the full article, "How to extend oil Drain Intervals Safely using Condition Monitoring" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
August 23, 2025
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

How do you set oil-analysis limits for diesel fleets?

What Baselines should you use?

Global oil suppliers have baseline or tolerance limits that are used when providing guidelines to customers about their equipment. The limits for a gearbox will differ from those of an engine. For instance, an iron content level of 3000ppm is normal for an automatic transmission gearbox but highly irregular for a diesel engine! Hence, it is important to know the limits associated with the application.

Some labs have also developed their own set of limits based on years of collecting hundreds of samples and liaising with their customers in the field. OEMs have also developed their own sets of limits (usually displayed in their manuals) based on their testing in the lab and on the field.

Knowing your own “normal” is more valuable than any generic industry limit.

Ideally, when developing your target levels, you should trend your data and find out what “normal” looks like for your equipment. In some cases, what is normal for your environment may be abnormal in a different environment. But it is important to note when normal varies from standard operating tolerances. This is where you would want to work together with your oil supplier, lab, and OEM to develop tolerances that align with your equipment.

Depending on your maintenance program, you can also adjust the tolerance accordingly. If you are aware that maintenance may not act on a threshold limit right away, it may be a good idea to add some padding to those limits. This ensures that the equipment does not suffer by pushing it to the limits.

What are the Oil Analysis Limits for Diesel Fleets?

Let’s explore how to set the limits for a diesel engine fleet of trucks.

Here is a step by step guide on developing an oil analysis program for diesel fleets.

First, let’s categorize the trucks into critical, semi-critical, and non-critical.

The critical ones are those that, if they break down, there is no replacement; the downtime hurts us financially and can delay the project. These need to be available 24/7.

The semi-critical ones are those that still have an impact on the operation if they break down, but it’s not quite as disastrous. These can be trucks that are not on tight deadlines, can afford to have some leniency or delays with their workload.

The non-critical trucks are those that can be easily swapped out for another truck without causing any delay or impact to the project, but they are still important.

Now that these are categorized, we need to find out what types of engines are being used and what the recommended diesel engine oils are for these units. Typically, most operators have mixed fleets. Thus, one may see a wide age/mileage gap in the engines. This gives us an idea of the reliability of the engines, which can impact the setting of the tolerance limits.

Since it’s a diesel engine fleet, it would be worthwhile to consider the type of fuel being used for this fleet. With diesel engines, there are varying levels of sulphur in the fuel, which can impact the oil drain intervals as well.

For this fleet, we may need to establish varying oil drain intervals to ensure maximum reliability, based on the categories outlined by their criticality. Before adopting set oil drain intervals, it is important to execute a pilot project with the fleet to anticipate any rollout challenges for the future. We will discuss these in more detail in the case study section.

 

Real-World Results from a Diesel Fleet Oil Analysis Program

Fleet: Mixed long-haul trucks of various ages/mileages

Predominant oil: Mineral 15w40 Diesel engine oil (CI4 spec)

Regular Oil Drain Interval: 3000km (based on best practice over time)

Approach: An engine asset list was first compiled for every truck in the fleet. This follows the table below:

Table 1: Sample of Engine Asset listing for Mixed long-haul fleet
Table 1: Sample of Engine Asset listing for Mixed long-haul fleet

It’s important to have a column for comments as this can capture some data that we may not be aware of, such as a recent engine overhaul done to the unit, or the driver has regularly lost power over the past few weeks, or the driver tops up the oil every time he gets back to the yard.

These little details may not be captured in the CMMS (if one exists) or the maintenance logs, but they are crucial in determining whether we can safely extend the oil drain intervals or not. For units that require special attention or are under warranty, these may have to be excluded until more favorable conditions exist.

Based on the fleet (15 trucks), they were categorized into three main groups:

Critical – these units were being used every day on projects that had tight deadlines. They were often unavailable to return to the yard for maintenance or oil changes, as each hour away from the job affected the project deadline.

Semi-critical – these units were utilized by various customers at distant locations and often spent most of their time at the customer site (due to the distance). Hence, basic maintenance was usually performed at the customer’s site, causing minimal disruption to the operation.

Non-Critical – these units are often deployed in situations where extra assistance is required, or they are the standby units if one of the critical units is in trouble.

Even though they had these three groupings, the engine types and mileages were very varied. Hence, a matrix was formed for this fleet.

Table 2: Criticality Matrix – Long-haul fleet
Table 2: Criticality Matrix – Long-haul fleet

The majority of the fleet falls within the 20-100,000km range, spanning across the critical, semi-critical, and non-critical categories.

A pilot test was done on the following:

  • 3 of the critical units within the 20-100,000km range
  • 1 semi-critical unit in the >100,000km range
  • 1 non-critical unit in the > 100,000km range

Since the typical oil drain interval was 3,000km, we took samples at 1500, 2000, 2500, and then again at 3000km. Based on the trend observed from the first 3 samples, we had a fair indication of the condition of the oil before it got to 3000km.

None of the samples showed any unusual signs of wear, excessive additive depletion, or ingress of contaminants. For these samples, we kept a close eye on maintaining the following parameters:

Table 3: Suggested Parameters to monitor for fleet
Table 3: Suggested Parameters to monitor for fleet

Samples were then taken at 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500 & 6000km. Then, another set of samples was taken at 6500, 7000, 7500, and 8000km once the oil analysis values were still within range. The aim was to at least double the oil drain interval for this fleet.

Intervals of 500km were used as a cautionary value to allow enough time for any anomalies to be caught. The critical engines got to these values faster than the semi-critical and non-critical units.

All of the critical units easily got to 9000km without any of the oil analysis values entering the warning zones. However, the semi-critical unit, which had exceeded 100,000km, only made it to 8,500 km before the TBN and fuel dilution values entered the warning zone. The non-critical unit, which exceeded 100,000km, also reached 9,000 km without any issues.

Since the owner wanted to be on the side of caution (and allow some wiggle room between the intervals for trucks which could not get maintenance done at the specified interval), they chose to change the oils across the fleet at the 7500km mark but keep the oil analysis program where they perform samples at 4000 & 7000km.

They will now work alongside oil analysis, and for some trucks, where they believe they can have an even longer interval, they will extend it accordingly.

What does this mean?

These engines take approximately 44 quarts or roughly 42 liters of oil and are changed every 3000km or roughly 2 months (critical units) with an average of 3 hours downtime for the oil change.

Hence, one unit undergoes approximately six oil changes per year:

  • An average of about 3 hours x 6 times = 18 hours downtime
  • An average of 42 liters x 6 times = 252 liters changed per year
  • Thus, for six critical units that would be:
  • Downtime => 18 hours x 6 units = 108 hours
  • Oil consumption = 252 liters x 6 units = 1,512 liters

The new oil drain interval of 7500km resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in the interval.

This means that the new interval would be every 5 months instead of every 2 months.

Thus, these six units would only do oil changes twice for the year.

New downtime = 3 hours x 2 times/year x 6 units = 36 hours / year

New oil consumption = 42 liters x 2 times/year x 6 units = 504 liters

The following table summarizes the changes.

Table 4: Comparison with extended oil drain interval (ODI)
Table 4: Comparison with extended oil drain interval (ODI)

This is just for part of the fleet, and a dollar value has not been assigned to these, but clearly, there are lots of benefits to extending the oil drain interval through guided oil analysis.

Find out more in the full article, "How to extend oil Drain Intervals Safely using Condition Monitoring" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
August 23, 2025
Oil Properties / Used Oil Analysis

Which parameters should you track in oil analysis?

 

 

 

Every type of equipment will have different tests that should be performed to monitor its health. We will break down a few common types and the associated basic and some specific oil analysis tests that should be performed.

 

Here are the key parameters you should track — and why each matters.

Diesel/Gasoline Engines (can be further broken down into on-road, stationary, aviation, landfill, and marine)

These are some Basic (monthly tests) and why they matter.

diesel-gasoline-engins

Gearboxes (can be broken down into industrial or automotive). These are the tests and why they matter.

gearboxes

Hydraulics

These are the tests for hydraulics and why they matter.

hydraulics

Turbines and Compressors

Here is a list of tests and why they matter for turbines and compressors.

turbines-compressors

We did not dive into Electrical oils, heat transfer oil, circulating oils, metalworking fluids, or seal oils, but these will have similar type tests and some special tests as well.

Find out more in the full article, "How to extend oil Drain Intervals Safely using Condition Monitoring" featured in Precision Lubrication Magazine by Sanya Mathura, CEO & Founder of Strategic Reliability Solutions Ltd. 

by
August 23, 2025