If we filled a swimming pool with honey during the winter when no heating was available, the honey would crystallize and become more viscous. Hence, if anyone tried to walk through the pool, moving would be difficult and require more energy. However, if heating was available to the pool, then the honey would be more fluid, and someone could walk a bit more freely (although still sticky at the end of the day!). As such, they would not have to exert as much energy.

The same applies to lubricants and their viscosities. If the lubricant is too viscous (thick honey in the winter), then more energy is required for the components while they are moving. For systems with varying temperatures, finding a lubricant that can maintain the desired viscosity for those changes is challenging.

However, with the invention of Viscosity index improvers, oils can now maintain a desired viscosity at variable temperatures. This significantly affects the energy the system requires and can reduce the energy needed, making some systems more efficient.

As such, the system’s overall efficiency is impacted, and less energy is required to overcome the internal frictional forces of the lubricant (as its viscosity remains within the required range). Passenger car engine oils saw this change with the integration of VIIs when multigrade oils were invented. They no longer needed one oil for summer and another oil for winter. This significantly saved many owners from draining and replacing their oils seasonally or finding their oil frozen in the winter!

Viscosity index improvers, therefore, enhance the overall efficiency of these systems by maintaining the lubricant’s viscosity throughout the changing temperatures. Subsequently, there is no need for additional heaters in the lube oil system, which would also require additional energy. This is another area where cost and energy savings can also be achieved.

Maintaining a particular viscosity at variable temperatures allows the lubricant to form a full film (also known as hydrodynamic or elastohydrodynamic lubrication) between the two surfaces, thus offering them protection from wear.

If the viscosity became reduced (due to an increase in temperature without the VII), then the lubricant would not form a full film or experience boundary or mixed lubrication. In this case, there is the potential for increased wear, which will negatively impact the components in the system. As such, using VIIs can also reduce the potential occurrence of wear or aid in reducing wear.

As per (Gresham & Totten, 2006), this does not mean that the viscosity never changes. When the viscosity of a lubricant changes, its viscosity index will change accordingly. If the viscosity index decreases, this can likely be because of the breakage of the polymeric Viscosity Index Improver polymer molecules to produce smaller chains, which essentially reduce its originally intended effect. If there is a reduction in the molecular weight of the VII, then the lubricant will see a reduced viscosity at both 40 & 100°C. This also reduces the temperature related viscosity effect.

Viscosity Index Improvers significantly improve a system’s overall efficiency and can help reduce wear. However, these additives can degrade over time with high temperatures and shear stress.