Tagged: additives

What are some innovations and future trends of Viscosity Index Improvers?

Innovations in Viscosity Index Improvers

As per Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik (2010), the three most important commercial VII families represent critical commercial techniques for manufacturing high molecular weight polymers. These are polymethacrylates produced by free radical chemistry, olefin copolymers produced by Ziegler chemistry, and hydrogenated styrene-diene or copolymers produced by anionic polymerization. While they are critical, these formulations will not be discussed in detail in this article, but we will take a look at some of the innovations within this space.

PARATONE®a, a family of viscosity index improvers currently belonging to Chevron Oronite, boasts of having developed the first Olefin Copolymer VII (Mid Continental Chemical Company Inc, 2024). However, upon further investigation, it must be noted that Exxon Chemicals was the original developer behind this product. Back in 1998, Oronite Additives, a division of Chevron Chemical Co. LLC, acquired the assets of Exxon Chemical’s Paratone crankcase olefin copolymer (OCP) Viscosity Index Improver Business (Chevron Chemical Co. LLC, 1988).

This particular Viscosity Index Improver has seen developments since the 1970s and offers solid and liquid VIIs for companies to include in their formulations (Chevron Oronite, 2024). It also allows improved formulating flexibility for developers, which can significantly reduce the costs involved or specialized base stocks depending on the product to be made. This is just one company that specializes in producing VIIs for the wider global market.

There are many other companies that have innovated in the Viscosity Index Improver space, but most of this work is patented as it involves heavy-balanced formulations. Other companies have also innovated on the production side of the VIIs by engineering equipment that can help produce a higher-quality VII.

Future Trends

(Future Market Insights, 2024) estimates the Viscosity Index Improver market will be USD 4.06B in 2024 and will increase to USD 5.39B by 2034. Additionally, in 2024, vehicle lubricants account for around 51.6% of the VII market. This is not just limited to the multigrade oils but includes transmission fluids, greases, and other oils. On the other hand, with the move towards more sustainable oils, Ethylene propylene Copolymer (OCP) is projected at a 30.4% industry share in 2024. Given the move towards more sustainable products, this is expected to increase.

If we take a global view of the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) per country to 2034, we can find some interesting facts. The United States shows a CAGR of 1.6%, with a heavy allocation towards more vehicle engine oil use and the manufacturing sector for pharmaceuticals and chemicals. On the other hand, Spain is projected to see a CAGR of 2.2% with auto manufacturers and power generation equipment (hydraulic oils, turbine oils, and greases).

Venturing to China, they have a CAGR of 3.2% due to the increased number of vehicles and significant industrialization. Their involvement in complex machinery will also drive this growth. The United Kingdom is positioned to see a CAGR of 1.1% resulting from its rise in high-performance engines and heavy industrialization. On the other hand, India should experience a CAGR of 4.3% with its high demand for industrial production, commerce, and automobiles.

Figure 2: CAGR% per country to 2034

With these positive CAGRs, it is conclusive that there will be a lot of growth within the VII industry. (Future Market Insights, 2024) also list some of the recent developments in the VII Market, which include:
In July 2023, Chevron Phillips Chemical announced a capacity expansion of its VII productions to meet the increasing demand for VIIs in the automotive and industrial sectors.
In April 2023, Lubrizol introduced a new line of viscosity index improvers (VIIs) for automotive lubricants, claiming to offer enhanced performance, including improved oxidation and thermal stability.
In March 2023, ABB completed the Marunda 2.0 oil blending plant extension project, doubling production capacity within three years despite challenges during the pandemic.
In October 2022, LCY Chemical Corp., a Taiwanese material science company, showcased its thermoplastic elastomer portfolio at K 2022. It highlighted its innovative approach to material science for a sustainable future, backed by a global distribution network.
In August 2022, Evonik’s Oil Additives division in CIS countries partnered with ADCO to enhance the energy productivity and effectiveness of industrial lubricants for construction, agriculture, mining, and manufacturing equipment.

From this, the future of Viscosity Index Improvers can only be enhanced by several of the major key players expanding their operations and innovating their creations to adapt to ever-evolving standards/guidelines set by OEMs and governments. As new regulations emerge regarding improved efficiency, increased oxidation stability, and thermal stability for lubricants, VII developers will be challenged to innovate new solutions for the lubricants to conform.

References

Chevron Chemical Co. LLC. (1988, October 08). Oronite Additives Acquires Exxon’s Paratone Viscosity Improver. Retrieved from Pharmaceutical Online: https://www.pharmaceuticalonline.com/doc/oronite-additives-acquires-exxons-paratone-vi-0001

Chevron Oronite. (2024, June 29). PARATONE® viscosity modifiers. Retrieved from Oronite: https://www.oronite.com/products-technology/paratone-products.html

Future Market Insights. (2024, April 15). Viscosity Index Improver Market Forecast by Vehicle and Industrial Lubricant for 2024 to 2034. Retrieved from Future Market Insights: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/viscosity-index-improvers-market

Gresham, R. M., & Totten, G. E. (2006). Lubrication and Maintenance of Industrial Machinery – Best Practices and Reliability. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Mid Continental Chemical Company Inc. (2024, June 29). Viscosity Modifiers / Viscosity Improvers. Retrieved from Mid-Continental Chemical Company: https://www.mcchemical.com/lubricant-additives/viscosity-index-improvers

Mortier, R. M., Fox, M. F., & Orszulik, S. T. (2010). Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants – Third Edition. Dordrecht: Springer.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

What impact do Viscosity Index Improvers have on Efficiency, Wear, and Degradation?

If we filled a swimming pool with honey during the winter when no heating was available, the honey would crystallize and become more viscous. Hence, if anyone tried to walk through the pool, moving would be difficult and require more energy. However, if heating was available to the pool, then the honey would be more fluid, and someone could walk a bit more freely (although still sticky at the end of the day!). As such, they would not have to exert as much energy.

The same applies to lubricants and their viscosities. If the lubricant is too viscous (thick honey in the winter), then more energy is required for the components while they are moving. For systems with varying temperatures, finding a lubricant that can maintain the desired viscosity for those changes is challenging.

However, with the invention of Viscosity index improvers, oils can now maintain a desired viscosity at variable temperatures. This significantly affects the energy the system requires and can reduce the energy needed, making some systems more efficient.

As such, the system’s overall efficiency is impacted, and less energy is required to overcome the internal frictional forces of the lubricant (as its viscosity remains within the required range). Passenger car engine oils saw this change with the integration of VIIs when multigrade oils were invented. They no longer needed one oil for summer and another oil for winter. This significantly saved many owners from draining and replacing their oils seasonally or finding their oil frozen in the winter!

Viscosity index improvers, therefore, enhance the overall efficiency of these systems by maintaining the lubricant’s viscosity throughout the changing temperatures. Subsequently, there is no need for additional heaters in the lube oil system, which would also require additional energy. This is another area where cost and energy savings can also be achieved.

Maintaining a particular viscosity at variable temperatures allows the lubricant to form a full film (also known as hydrodynamic or elastohydrodynamic lubrication) between the two surfaces, thus offering them protection from wear.

If the viscosity became reduced (due to an increase in temperature without the VII), then the lubricant would not form a full film or experience boundary or mixed lubrication. In this case, there is the potential for increased wear, which will negatively impact the components in the system. As such, using VIIs can also reduce the potential occurrence of wear or aid in reducing wear.

As per (Gresham & Totten, 2006), this does not mean that the viscosity never changes. When the viscosity of a lubricant changes, its viscosity index will change accordingly. If the viscosity index decreases, this can likely be because of the breakage of the polymeric Viscosity Index Improver polymer molecules to produce smaller chains, which essentially reduce its originally intended effect. If there is a reduction in the molecular weight of the VII, then the lubricant will see a reduced viscosity at both 40 & 100°C. This also reduces the temperature related viscosity effect.

Viscosity Index Improvers significantly improve a system’s overall efficiency and can help reduce wear. However, these additives can degrade over time with high temperatures and shear stress.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

What is the role of Viscosity Index Improvers in Lubricants?

Viscosity Index Improvers began their commercial debut around the 1950s to accommodate the new developments in automotive oils, which were then adapting multigrade viscosities. However, they were used even before (back in the 1930s) when workers in crude distillation realized that small amounts of rubber improved the VI of the oil but also increased sludge formation.

Today, VIIs are still primarily used as engine lubricants. They can also be found in automatic transmission fluids, multipurpose tractor transmission fluids, power steering fluids, shock absorber fluids, hydraulic fluids, manual transmission fluids, rear axle lubricants, industrial gear oils, turbine engine oils, and aircraft piston engine oils. (Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik, 2010)

Essentially, VIIs try to maintain the oil’s viscosity at varying temperatures. They try to ensure that the oil does not experience a loss of viscosity, which can occur due to high temperature or shear. VIIs can be considered polymers, which are tightly wound coils. When temperature or shear is applied to these coils, they unravel (lose their viscosity). Depending on the amount of shear, they may never recover their original shape (or viscosity).

As seen in Figure 1 below, Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik (2010) describe the change in the shape of the VIIs as a result of high temperature or shear. They can coil and uncoil depending on the shear stress, but if the bonds are broken, they will not reform their original coil and lose their intended viscosity.

Figure 1: Mechanical Polymer Degradation (excerpted from (Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik, 2010)

Interestingly enough, it must be noted that some VIIs provide lubricants with additional functions of Pour point depression and dispersancy. This is highly dependent on their composition.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

What are Viscosity Index Improvers?

Viscosity Index Improvers (VIIs) are additives that help maintain the viscosity of lubricating oils across a wide temperature range, ensuring consistent performance.

This article will explore the nature of viscosity index improvers and their role in industrial and automotive lubricants. We will also look at their impact on lubricant efficiency, innovations involving this type of additive, and future trends.

Before discussing the nature of viscosity index improvers, we need to understand the role of viscosity. Essentially, this is one of the most critical functions of a lubricant, as it directly affects its flow rate and ability to keep the two interacting surfaces apart.

By nature, all base oils have an assigned viscosity based on their blend. However, other properties are required when we’re creating finished industrial or automotive lubricants. For instance, we may need the oil to withstand higher temperatures while still maintaining a particular viscosity, which not only provides wear protection for the equipment but also flows at a rate that does not incur frictional losses. Those are a lot of functions!

Typically, as temperature increases, viscosity decreases, and as the temperature decreases, the viscosity increases. One example is the state of water: when heated, it can turn into a gas (lower viscosity), or when frozen, it can transform into ice (higher viscosity). However, depending on the type of material, there will be varying rates of viscosity change with temperature. The viscosity/temperature relationship is called the viscosity index (VI).

As per Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik (2010), the kinematic viscosity of oil is measured at 40°C and then at 100°C. The viscosity change is then compared with an empirical reference scale initially based on two sets of crude oils: a Pennsylvania crude arbitrarily assigned a VI of 100 and a Texas Gulf crude assigned a VI of 0.

The higher the VI, the less effect that temperature has on the oil, which means that the oil can maintain a particular viscosity for a longer time at a more extensive temperature range. This is ideal for lubricants in environments experiencing temperature changes. However, not all oils have a high viscosity index. Typically, paraffinic oils can have a very high viscosity index. On the other hand, naphthenic oils have a low or medium viscosity index. The table below gives an overview of the viscosity index for various oils.

Table 1: Viscosity index of API Groups I-III

When trying to manage or alter the viscosity index of the oils above, the use of Viscosity Index Improvers (VII) can help by adding that property to an oil to allow it to have other beneficial properties. As per (Mortier, Fox, & Orszulik, 2010), viscosity index improvers consist of five main classes of polymers:

Polymethylmethacrylates (PMAs).
Olefin copolymers (OCPs).
Hydrogenated poly (styrene-co-butadiene or isoprene) (HSD/SIP/HRIs).
Esterified polystyrene-co-maleic anhydride (SPEs)
A combination of PMA/OCP systems.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

What Happens When Defoamants, Dispersants & Detergents Are Used Up?

For the three additives we spoke about earlier, each of them is sacrificial in one way or another.

Defoamants get used up when they are called upon to reduce the foam in the oil. On the other hand, detergents and dispersants use their characteristics to suspend contaminants in the oil.

In all of these scenarios, each of these additives can be considered to become depleted over time. While performing their functions, they will undergo reactions that reduce their capability to perform them more than once.

Hence, it can be concluded that these additives become depleted over time even though they may not have physically left the oil but now exist in a different form.

The air release property of the oil is affected by the loss of defoamants. This value will see a significant rise, indicating that it takes longer for air to be released from the oil. As such, air remains in the oil in either a free, dissolved, entrained, or foam state.

Consequently, this impacts the ability of the oil to lubricate the components properly and can even result in microdieseling and increased oil temperatures in the sump.

On the other hand, as the detergents and dispersants are reduced, the capacity of the oil to hold contaminants also decreases.

Therefore, one will begin noticing that deposits may start forming on the equipment’s insides, leading to valves sticking (especially in hydraulic systems) or a general increase in the system’s temperature as these deposits can trap heat.

With the introduction of an increased temperature, the oil can begin oxidizing, leading to more deposits being formed and possibly even varnish.

Essentially, these additives are essential to the health of the oil in your system. The detergents and dispersants can help to keep your system clean (free from contaminants such as soot).

The defoamants can even reduce the risk of wear, increased temperatures to the lube system, the potential to form varnish, or the possibility of succumbing to microdieseling.

References

1 Bruce, R. W. (2012). Handbook of Lubrication and Tribology – Volume II Theory and Design – Second Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.

2 Mang, P., & Dresel, D. (2007). Lubricants and Lubrication – Second Edition. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA.

4 Mang, P.-I., Bobzin, P.-I., & Bartels, D.-I. (2011). Industrial Tribology Tribosystems, Friction, Wear and Surface Engineering, Lubrication. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag & Co KGaA.

3 Mortier, D. M., Fox, P. F., & Orszulik, D. T. (2010). Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants – Third Edition. Dordrecht Heidelberg: Springer.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

Do Detergents Really Clean?

Traditionally, detergents were given their name as it was assumed that they provided cleaning properties to the oil, similar to laundry detergents. However, these metal-containing compounds also provide an alkaline reserve used to neutralize acidic combustion and oxidation by-products.

Due to their nature, these compounds disperse particulate matter, such as abrasive wear and soot particles, rather than removing them (in a cleaning action). There are four main types of detergents: phenates, salicylates, thiophosphate, and sulfonates⁴.

Calcium phenates are the most common type of phenate. They are formed by synthesizing alkylated phenols with elemental sulphur or sulphur chloride, followed by neutralization with metal oxides or hydroxides. These calcium phenates have good dispersant properties and possess a greater acid-neutralization potential.

Salicylates have additional antioxidant properties and a proven efficacy in diesel engine oil formulations. They are prepared through the carboxylation of alkylated phenols with subsequent metathesis into divalent metal salts. These products are then overbased with excess metal carbonate to form highly basic detergents.

Thiophosphonates are rarely used today as they are an overbased product.

Sulfonates generally have excellent anticorrosion properties. The neutral (or over-based) sulfonates have excellent detergent and neutralization potential. These neutral sulfonates are typically formed with colloidally dispersed metal oxides or hydroxides.

Calcium sulfonates are relatively cheap and have good performance. On the other hand, magnesium sulfonates exhibit excellent anticorrosion properties but can form hard ash deposits after thermal degradation, leading to bore polishing in engines. Barium sulfonates are not used due to their toxic properties.

Detergents in ATFs are used in concentrations of 0.1-1.0% for cleanliness, friction, corrosion inhibition, and reduction of wear3. However, these values are a bit higher in manual transmission fluids, at 0.0 – 3.0%. On the other hand, no detergents are required for axle lubricants!

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

Why Are Dispersants Important?

Quite often, detergents and dispersants are grouped together mainly because their functions can complement each other. As noted above, the significant difference is that dispersants are ashless, while detergents are more metal-containing compounds.

However, some ashless dispersants also offer “cleaning” properties, so the two are not mutually exclusive.

A large oleophilic hydrocarbon tail and a polar hydrophilic head group can categorize detergents and dispersants. Typically, the tail solubilizes in the base fluid while the head is attracted to the contaminants in the lubricant.

Dispersant molecules envelop the solid contaminants to form micelles, and the non-polar tails prevent the adhesion of these particles onto the metal surfaces so that they agglomerate into larger particles and appear suspended.

Ashless dispersants are, by definition, those that do not contain metal and are typically derived from hydrocarbon polymers, with the most popular being polybutenes (PIBs).

For example, dispersants are typically required in concentrations of 2-6% in ATFs and are used to maintain cleanliness, disperse sludge, and reduce friction and wear³. These values in manual transmission fluids and axle lubricants vary from 1-4%.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

Are Defoamants Necessary?

Defoamants, also called antifoam additives, are found in many oils. Most oils need to keep foam levels to a minimum, and it is very easy for foam to form in lube systems due to their design and flow throughout the equipment.

When foam enters the oil, it can affect its ability to provide adequate surface lubrication. This can lead to wear occurring at the surface level, damaging the equipment.
Many oils require defoamants to provide various functions and in differing ratios depending on their application. In automatic transmission fluids (ATFs), defoamants are usually needed in concentrations of 50-400ppm to prevent excessive foaming and air entrainment3. On the other hand, for manual transmission fluids and axle lubricants, defoamants are required in slightly lower concentrations, between 50 and 300 ppm.

However, OEMs must verify these concentrations. If the concentration of defoamants is too high, this can actually increase foaming. Additionally, defoamants must be properly balanced with the other additive packages to ensure they do not negatively counteract another additive.

There are two main types of defoamants: silicone defoamers and silicone-free defoamers. Silicone defoamers are considered the most efficient defoamants, especially at low concentrations of around 1%. These defoamants are typically pre-dissolved in aromatic solvents to provide a stable dispersion.

However, there are two significant disadvantages associated with silicone defoamers. Due to their insolubility, they can easily transition out of the oil and have a powerful affinity to polar metal surfaces.

On the other hand, silicone-free defoamers are another alternative, especially for applications that require silicone-free lubricants. Such applications include metal-working fluids and hydraulics, which are used close to silicone-free ones, and even those involved in applying paints or lacquers to these pieces.

Some silicone-free defoamers include poly(ethylene glycol)s (PEG), polyethers, polymethacrylates, and organic copolymers. Tributylphosphate is also another option for defoamers4.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Oil Properties

Defoamants, Dispersants, and Detergents in Lubricants – What’s the Difference?

Additives can enhance, suppress, or add new properties to oils. Defoamants, dispersants, and detergents are no exceptions. This trio of additives can be found in most finished lubricants, albeit in varying ratios.

Let’s discuss the main differences among these three, why each is so important, and ways to confirm their presence.

What’s the Difference?

While they are all additives (which begin with the letter D), their functions are distinctively different. They all work to protect the oil from various types of contaminants.

For instance, defoamants reduce the air bubbles in the oil. At the same time, detergents keep the metal surfaces clean, and dispersants encapsulate the contaminants so they are suspended in the lubricant.¹ This is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Defoamants, detergents and dispersants explained.

From our last article on Lubricant Additives – A Comprehensive Guide, here are some detailed descriptions of how each of these additives functions.

Defoamants

When foam forms in the lubricant, tiny air bubbles become trapped either at the surface or on the inside (called inner foam). Defoamants work by adsorbing on the foam bubble and affecting the bubble surface tension. This causes coalescence and breaks the bubble on the lubricant’s surface¹.

For the foam that forms at the surface, called surface foam, defoamants with a lower surface tension are used. They are usually not soluble in base oil and must be finely dispersed to be sufficiently stable even after long-term storage or use.

On the other hand, inner foam, which is finely dispersed air bubbles in the lubricant, can form stable dispersions. Common defoamants are designed to control surface foam but stabilize inner foam².

Dispersants

On the other hand, dispersants are also polar, and they keep contaminants and insoluble oil components suspended in the lubricant. They minimize particle agglomeration, which in turn maintains the oil’s viscosity (compared to particle coalescing, which leads to thickening). Unlike detergents, dispersants are considered ashless. They typically work at low operating temperatures.

Detergents

Detergents are polar molecules that remove substances from the metal surface, similar to a cleaning action. However, some detergents also provide antioxidant properties. The nature of a detergent is essential, as metal-containing detergents produce ash (typically calcium, lithium, potassium, and sodium)1.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!

Lubricant Degradation

Testing Methods for Detecting Antioxidants in Lubricants

Since we now have more information about the various types of antioxidants and how they function to suppress oxidation, the next step is to determine whether they are indeed present in our finished lubricants.

The industry tries to identify the presence of antioxidants in a couple of ways. The first way is to measure the rate of oxidation, which does not give the exact value of remaining antioxidants. Instead, it gives the user an idea of how much oxidation has taken place based on other lubricant characteristics.

Then, the user must make an informed decision on the remaining life of the oil. On the other hand, there is one direct test to determine which antioxidants are present in the oil and provide their remaining quantity.

Some common tests in the industry that measure the oxidation rate include RPVOT (Rotating Pressure Vessel Oxidation Test), Oxidation via FTIR, Viscosity, and TOST (Turbine Oil Oxidation Stability Test).

While none of these actually quantify the remaining antioxidants in the oil, they all provide the user with an indication of the rate of oxidation currently occurring in the oil. We will dive deeper into these to understand how they assess oxidation rates.

RPVOT

In the industry, RPVOT has been used for decades to provide users with an idea of the rate of oxidation occurring in their oils. However, this test is performed where the sample is placed in a sealed container with pressurized pure oxygen and rotated at a high speed in a bath with a higher temperature to promote the oil’s oxidation⁸.

As oxidation occurs, there is a pressure drop in the vessel, and the rate of this pressure drop is compared to that of new oil. The final result is given in minutes. Typically, if the value falls below 25% of the original value, the oil is on its way out or almost at the end of its remaining useful life.

But what happens if the value is at 75%? Since the final result is given in minutes, it isn’t easy to correlate that value to a value in the field.

For instance, if the RPVOT result was 800 minutes, we cannot easily correlate that to a particular number of years or months of life remaining for the oil. Hence, this method does not truly measure the remaining antioxidants in the oil.

Oxidation via FTIR

Another way of measuring oxidation is by identifying its presence through FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) Spectroscopy. In this type of test, each element produces a unique fingerprint.

As such, oxidation produces a particular peak between 1600-1800 cm-1. There is no absolute reference for oxidation peaks; therefore, these are usually compared against the new oil samples⁹.

This test (ASTM D 7414) is usually used for engine oils rather than industrial oils. However, it still does not provide the user with the remaining antioxidants in the oil. Instead, only that oxidation has already occurred.

Viscosity

In the past, viscosity was usually cited as a method for detecting if oxidation was occurring in the oil. However, due to more recent discoveries and technological evolution, we have noted that the oil’s viscosity only increases after oxidation has occurred.

Therefore, it is not a valid test to identify if oxidation is happening in the oil, as there can be several reasons for the increase in viscosity. In the case of oxidation, the presence of varnish and sludge would account for this increase; however, this test still doesn’t indicate the remaining antioxidants in the oil⁹.

TOST

This test, developed in 1943, evaluates the oil after it is subjected to very specific conditions. Typically, the oil is stressed with high temperatures (203°F / 95°C), gross contamination (17% water), and substantial air entrainment in the presence of iron and copper catalysts⁵.

The oil’s life is measured by the time the sample takes to achieve an Acid number of 2 mg KOH/g.

As such, this test measures the amount of acid produced by an oil under extreme conditions. Again, it does not give us a quantifiable correlation to the oil’s actual field life. It must also be noted that this test is not suited for hydraulic or gear oils but is more tailored to steam turbine oils, which may undergo those simulated conditions.

RULER® test

The RULER test utilizes linear sweep voltammetry to detect the quantity of antioxidants remaining in the oil. It produces a graph showing peaks at the detected antioxidants. Typically, the used oil results are compared against the baseline data to determine the quantity of antioxidants in the oil (Fluitec, 2022).

This method allows users to specifically quantify and trend the decline of antioxidants in the oil over a period of time, as seen in Figure 2. This is very valuable as users can now provide a better estimate of the remaining useful life based on the trend of the decline of antioxidants, and by extension, this helps them to understand the health of their oil.

Figure 2: RULER graph of a standard bearing oil vs. used bearing oil.

Oxidation occurs worldwide on almost every item (food, the human body, and lubricants). It is not going away anytime soon. Hence, there will always be a need for antioxidants to help protect the base oils for finished lubricants.

However, the formulations of these antioxidants may evolve over time as scientists find new, more sustainable alternatives for creating antioxidants.

OEMs also have a role to play as they advance machines and their capabilities; lubricants will have to be engineered for these new applications with varying environmental conditions. As such, there may be a greater need for more advanced antioxidants to help protect the oil.

References

Bruce, R. (2012). Handbook of Lubrication and Tribology Volume II Theory and Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
(2022, July 20). Why Choose RULER? Retrieved from Fluitec: https://www.fluitec.com/why-choose-ruler/
Livingstone, G. (2024, February 15). Varnish Deposits in Bearings, Causes, Consequences and Cures. Retrieved from Precision Lubrication Magazine: https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/varnish-deposits-in-bearings-causes-consequences-and-cures/
Mang, T., & Dresel, W. (2007). Lubricants and Lubrication. Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
(2016, April 17). Oil Oxidation Stability Test. Retrieved from Mobil: https://www.mobil.com/en/lubricants/for-businesses/industrial/lubricant-expertise/resources/oil-oxidation-stability-test
Mortier, R. M., Fox, M. F., & Orszulik, S. T. (2010). Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants. Dordrecht: Springer.
Pirro, D. M., Webster, M., & Daschner, E. (2016). Lubrication Fundamentals, Third Edition, Revised and Expanded. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
(2024, March 06). Oxidation, the oil killer. Retrieved from SKF: https://www.skf.com/us/services/recondoil/knowledge-hub/recondoil-articles/oxidation-the-oil-killer
Spectro Scientific. (2024, March 06). Measuring Oil Chemistry: Nitration, Oxidation, and Sulfation. Retrieved from Spectro Scientific: https://www.spectrosci.com/en/knowledge-center/test-parameters/measuring-oil-chemistry-nitration-oxidation-and-sulfation
Stachowiak, G. W., & Batchelor, A. W. (2014). Engineering Tribology. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Want to read the entire article? Find it here in Precision Lubrication Magazine!